Summary
Bitcoin has fallen to around $71,000, bringing a familiar mix of fear and dip-buying sentiment back to the market. However, the most concerning aspect of this decline may go beyond price weakness and leveraged liquidations. The underlying market capital structure appears to be changing. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded five consecutive trading days of net outflows, totaling approximately $1.438 billion, while stablecoin supply continues to contract, potentially reducing the fresh liquidity available to absorb selling pressure. Meanwhile, some medium-to-large BTC holders have started accumulating, even as the largest wallet groups continue to reduce their holdings. The presence of buyers does not necessarily mean the market has regained broad-based demand. For BTC, the key question is no longer simply whether $71,000 can hold, but whether ETF flows, stablecoin supply, real interest rates, and on-chain holding patterns can begin improving together.
Bitcoin has once again reached a level that is putting the market on edge.
The price has retreated to around $71,000, down more than 3% over 24 hours. Discussions about whether the market has finally bottomed and whether it is time to buy the dip are gaining traction across social media.
But looking beyond the price chart reveals several developments that deserve closer attention:
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded consecutive days of net outflows. Stablecoin supply is shrinking. Leveraged long positions have faced widespread liquidations during the rapid decline. Meanwhile, the U.S. 10-year real Treasury yield has climbed to 2.86%.
Taken together, these signals may point to more than short-term market panic. Risk assets could be facing increasingly significant liquidity pressure.
Of course, the market is not made up of sellers alone.
According to Glassnode data, some wallet cohorts holding between 100 and 10,000 BTC have started accumulating again. In other words, while some capital is moving out of the market, other investors are attempting to buy into the weakness.
The questions are:
Can these buyers keep buying? Does the market still have enough fresh capital to support a sustained Bitcoin recovery?
[Image]
Bitcoin at $71,000: Why Capital Outflows Are the Bigger Warning Sign
In our previous article, we discussed an important point:
When BTC fell from around $86,000 to $81,000, higher trading volume did not necessarily mean that genuine new capital was entering the market.
At that time, the key questions were whether buyers would continue absorbing selling pressure during pullbacks and whether demand could push the market toward higher lows.
This time, the focus needs to go one step further: where is the capital coming from, and where is it going?
Spot Bitcoin ETFs Continue to Record Net Outflows
According to Farside data, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows for five consecutive trading days between November 5 and November 11, 2026, with cumulative outflows of approximately $1.438 billion.
On November 11 alone, net outflows reached approximately $299.8 million.
This indicates that capital allocated to Bitcoin through U.S. spot ETFs has recently been moving out of these products.
It is important to note that ETF outflows do not mean every institutional investor has turned bearish on BTC. Nor do they prove that the long-term investment thesis has fundamentally changed. ETF subscriptions and redemptions can also be affected by client allocation decisions, arbitrage strategies, and adjustments to risk exposure.
However, five consecutive trading days of net outflows across the sector highlight one important point:
Capital entering the Bitcoin market through the ETF channel has not yet returned to a sustained net-inflow trend.
If BTC continues to decline while ETF outflows persist, the market will need buyers from other channels to absorb the selling pressure.
This is why simply watching whether Bitcoin reaches a particular round-number price level may not be enough.
Stablecoin Supply Is Also Contracting
If ETF data reflects changes in investment allocation, stablecoin supply can offer another perspective on the amount of capital circulating within the crypto market.
Stablecoins are widely used as units of account and settlement assets across blockchain networks and trading platforms. Their supply is also commonly monitored as an indicator of potential purchasing power within the crypto ecosystem.
According to DefiLlama data as of November 12, global USD-pegged stablecoin supply stood at approximately $289.5 billion. This represented a decline of around $4.381 billion over seven days and approximately $14.747 billion over 30 days, a decrease of roughly 4.85%.
In other words, the overall supply of stablecoins in the market is shrinking.
However, a decline in stablecoin supply does not necessarily mean that all of the capital has directly left the crypto market. Redemptions, transfers between platforms, and changes in the supply of individual stablecoins can also affect the total.
The more important point is this:
When ETF outflows continue while stablecoin supply contracts, the amount of fresh capital potentially available to absorb selling pressure may be declining.
That could make a sustained BTC recovery more difficult.
For prices to move higher over time, it is not enough for buyers to appear once. The market needs sufficient capital to absorb selling pressure across multiple price levels.
Leveraged Longs Are Being Liquidated, but Bullish Sentiment Has Not Completely Disappeared
Beyond spot-market capital flows, the derivatives market is also showing significant changes.
When BTC falls sharply, traders using leverage to establish long positions are particularly vulnerable.
If the price moves beyond the level their margin can support, trading platforms may trigger forced liquidations, adding further selling pressure to the market.
According to the original market statistics, BTC derivatives recorded approximately $283 million in liquidations over the past 24 hours, with long positions accounting for around 96% of the total.
This suggests that leveraged traders betting on higher prices have borne the brunt of the latest decline.
However, there is another detail worth watching:
A falling price does not necessarily mean bullish sentiment has completely disappeared.
If funding rates remain positive, traders holding long positions in the relevant perpetual futures markets are generally still paying funding fees.
This may indicate that some traders continue to favor long positions, or that positioning across the market has not yet undergone a complete reset.
However, a positive funding rate alone cannot prove that long positions are excessively crowded, nor can it predict the next market move.
It should be assessed alongside open interest, liquidation volume, aggressive buying and selling activity, and price action.
For example:
- If BTC continues falling while open interest declines, some leveraged positions may be getting flushed out of the market.
- If the price rebounds but funding rates rise rapidly, it may suggest that traders are rebuilding long positions.
- If the price stabilizes, open interest gradually recovers, and spot buying strengthens, the rebound may have a more solid foundation than one driven primarily by derivatives trading.
Therefore, a wave of liquidations does not necessarily mean the market has completed its deleveraging process.
The real questions are:
Have enough leveraged positions been cleared out, and are new long positions beginning to accumulate at the same price levels again?
Why Does a Rise in the U.S. Real Interest Rate to 2.86% Matter for Bitcoin?
Liquidity in the crypto market does not exist in isolation.
When real returns on dollar-denominated assets rise, the opportunity cost of holding lower-risk assets may also increase.
This can influence how investors allocate capital between equities, cryptocurrencies, and other risk assets.
As of November 12, 2026, the U.S. 10-year real Treasury yield had risen to 2.86%, up from 2.78% on the previous trading day.
A higher real interest rate means investors can potentially earn a greater inflation-adjusted return from U.S. Treasuries and similar assets.
For a non-yielding asset like Bitcoin, this may create additional valuation pressure.
However, the relationship between real interest rates and BTC prices is not a simple one-to-one correlation. Market liquidity, the U.S. dollar, expectations for monetary policy, institutional allocation decisions, and overall risk appetite can all influence Bitcoin's price at the same time.
What matters most is whether several factors begin moving in the same direction:
Rising real interest rates, continued ETF outflows, shrinking stablecoin supply, and persistent weakness in BTC prices.
If these signals occur simultaneously, the market may be entering a more restrictive capital environment.
In other words:
Bitcoin may now be facing more than trader panic. Changes in broader capital allocation preferences could also be putting pressure on the market.
Buyers on One Side, Sellers on the Other: Large BTC Wallets Show Diverging Behavior
If the market were experiencing only capital outflows, the situation would be relatively straightforward to analyze.
However, current on-chain data presents a more complicated picture.
According to Glassnode's weekly on-chain report published on November 11, wallet cohorts holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC, as well as those holding between 1,000 and 10,000 BTC, showed signs of accumulation during the seven-day observation period ending November 9.
Meanwhile, other wallet-size cohorts remained broadly in distribution, including the largest group holding more than 10,000 BTC.
This means that the current buying activity is not coming from all large holders simultaneously. Instead, accumulation is concentrated among certain medium-to-large wallet cohorts.
This divergence deserves attention.
Why Doesn't Accumulation by Medium-to-Large Wallets Mean the Market Has Bottomed?
First, changes in on-chain wallet balances do not necessarily reveal the identities of actual investors.
One wallet address does not always represent one individual investor. A single institution may control multiple addresses. Exchange operations, custodial arrangements, and asset management structures can also affect wallet balances.
Second, Glassnode's Accumulation Trend Score reflects changes in the balances of specific wallet cohorts over a given observation period. It does not directly represent the exact amount of capital invested, nor does it prove that these funds belong to long-term investors.
More importantly, similar periods of selective accumulation have occurred in the past without developing into a broad market reversal.
A more reasonable interpretation at this stage is:
Some medium-to-large holders are beginning to absorb supply, but the overall market capital structure has not yet shown consistent improvement.
If other wallet cohorts also begin accumulating, while ETF outflows narrow and stablecoin supply starts growing again, buying activity may become broader and more convincing.
On the other hand, if accumulation remains limited to a few wallet groups while ETF and stablecoin-related capital continues to contract, this localized buying may not be enough to change the broader market trend.
Three Key Bitcoin Price Levels to Watch Next
When the market's capital structure is changing, price levels remain important. However, they should not be used as the sole basis for buying or selling decisions.
Based on current market conditions, three areas deserve particular attention.
$71,000: Can the Short-Term Low Hold?
The $71,000 area is an important short-term price zone to monitor.
If BTC finds sustained buying support here and repeatedly recovers after testing this level, it may gradually develop into a short-term support area.
However, if the price repeatedly breaks below this zone and fails to reclaim it quickly, selling pressure may still be dominating the market.
$73,200: Can the Rebound Regain Its Footing?
If BTC rebounds from its recent lows, the area around $73,200 can serve as a reference point for evaluating the strength of the recovery.
The key is not whether the price briefly moves above this level, but whether it can remain there.
If BTC holds above this area while spot trading volume improves and aggressive buying continues, the quality of the rebound may be strengthening.
If the move is driven primarily by derivatives activity and quickly reverses, its sustainability will remain uncertain.
$75,600: Can BTC Reclaim the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis?
Glassnode's report places the average cost basis of Bitcoin short-term holders at approximately $75,600.
Short-term holders generally refer to investors who have held their BTC for fewer than 155 days.
When the BTC price falls below this average cost basis, some recent buyers may be holding unrealized losses.
If BTC moves back above $75,600 and manages to stay there, the profitability of short-term holders may improve, potentially supporting a recovery in market sentiment.
However, this level does not guarantee a trend reversal once broken.
Investors who previously bought near this price may choose to sell when the market returns to their entry levels, creating additional selling pressure.
The real questions are:
Can the price hold above this level, and will fresh capital continue entering the market afterward?
KTX Crypto Insights: Assessing the Return of Liquidity Matters More Than Guessing the Bottom
The most important feature of this latest decline is the coexistence of capital outflows and localized buying activity.
Continued ETF net outflows suggest that institutional allocation channels are under pressure. Shrinking stablecoin supply may indicate a reduction in the market's potential purchasing power. Meanwhile, concentrated liquidations of leveraged longs show that the derivatives market is still adjusting its positioning.
At the same time, some medium-to-large BTC wallet cohorts have begun accumulating, suggesting that the market has not completely lost its buying support.
However, these signals are not yet pointing in the same direction.
For this reason, it is worth monitoring several indicators together:
BTC price structure → ETF net inflows/outflows → Stablecoin supply → Funding rates → Open interest → Liquidation volume → On-chain wallet accumulation trends
The most important task is to see whether these indicators begin to confirm one another.
If BTC rebounds while ETF outflows narrow, stablecoin supply gradually recovers, and funding rates remain at relatively moderate levels, the market may be developing a healthier recovery structure.
However, if the price only rebounds briefly while ETF outflows continue, stablecoin supply keeps shrinking, and leveraged long positions begin building up again, the market may still lack the capital needed to sustain an upward move.
Users can visit the KTX BTC/USDT Spot Trading Page to monitor BTC's live price, 24-hour price change, trading volume, and order book activity.
To explore other markets and trading products offered by KTX, visit the KTX Official Website.
One thing to remember:
The market does not automatically form a bottom simply because a particular wallet cohort starts buying.
What really matters is whether capital outflows slow down, buying demand broadens, and price action gradually improves through sustained buying support.
FAQ
Is it a good time to buy BTC near $71,000?
Price alone is not enough to make that decision.
The $71,000 area can serve as a reference point for monitoring short-term support. However, whether a genuine bottom is forming needs to be assessed alongside trading volume, spot-market demand, ETF flows, and the structure of subsequent price lows.
What do consecutive net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs mean?
They indicate that capital allocated to Bitcoin through U.S. spot ETFs has been moving out of these products recently.
However, ETF outflows do not mean all institutional investors have turned bearish, nor do they independently prove that the long-term investment thesis has changed. The more important question is whether outflows continue or eventually turn into sustained net inflows.
Why is declining stablecoin supply worth monitoring?
Stablecoins are important trading and settlement assets within the crypto market.
A sustained decline in their supply may indicate that some capital is being redeemed or leaving the crypto ecosystem, potentially reducing the market's available purchasing power.
However, stablecoin supply should not be treated as equivalent to immediately available buying power on exchanges. Exchange balances, on-chain capital flows, and trading activity should also be considered.
Why can funding rates remain positive while BTC is falling?
Funding rates reflect payments exchanged between long and short positions in perpetual futures markets.
When funding rates are positive, long-position holders generally pay funding fees to short-position holders. This suggests that the relevant derivatives market still has a degree of bullish positioning.
However, this does not mean that buyers are necessarily in control, nor does it determine whether the next price move will be upward or downward.
Does accumulation by medium-to-large BTC wallets mean the market has bottomed?
Not necessarily.
Glassnode data shows that recent accumulation has mainly been concentrated among wallet cohorts holding between 100 and 10,000 BTC, while wallets holding more than 10,000 BTC have remained broadly in distribution.
This suggests that buying activity is still relatively selective and should not be interpreted as a broad return of all large investors.
Why can rising U.S. 10-year real interest rates affect BTC?
Higher real interest rates may increase the inflation-adjusted returns available from U.S. Treasuries and similar assets, raising the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets such as Bitcoin.
However, BTC prices are also influenced by dollar liquidity, market sentiment, institutional allocation, and other macroeconomic factors. Real interest rates should therefore not be used in isolation to predict Bitcoin's next move.
Conclusion
After BTC fell to around $71,000, the market once again faced a familiar question:
Is this a buying opportunity, or the beginning of a deeper correction?
Unlike previous discussions focused mainly on price pullbacks, this time the more important issue is the changing structure of market capital.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded five consecutive trading days of net outflows, while stablecoin supply continues to contract. Together, these developments suggest that market liquidity has not yet shown a clear recovery.
Leveraged longs have also faced concentrated liquidations, reflecting ongoing position adjustments in the derivatives market.
Meanwhile, some medium-to-large BTC wallet cohorts have begun accumulating, but wallets holding more than 10,000 BTC remain broadly in distribution. This suggests that buying demand has not yet developed into broad market consensus.
Therefore, the most important questions are not simply about identifying the lowest price. Instead, investors should watch for three developments:
When will ETF outflows stop?
When will stablecoin supply begin growing again?
Can localized accumulation gradually expand into broader market demand?
If these signals begin improving together, BTC may gain a more solid foundation for recovery.
On the other hand, if prices rebound while capital continues to leave the market, investors should remain alert to the possibility of renewed selling pressure after a short-term bounce.
Our previous article discussed why an ordinary market pullback should not be mistaken for a trend reversal.
This time, the market presents a deeper question:
When some investors start buying the dip, does the broader market still have enough capital to follow?
For Bitcoin, a bottom is not created by market sentiment alone, nor can it be confirmed by the buying activity of a single wallet group.
What truly matters is whether capital returns to the market — and whether it stays.
Original Source
比特币多头惨遭血洗！但最可怕的信号才刚刚出现。
BTC跌到71,000美元附近，24小时跌幅超过3%。
这轮下跌不只是散户爆仓，更值得关注的是市场资金结构正在发生变化。
美国现货BTC ETF连续5个交易日净流出，累计约14.38亿美元；稳定币供应量也在收缩，市场新增流动性可能正在减少。
与此同时，杠杆多头遭到集中清算，部分中大型BTC钱包却开始积累，而超大规模钱包整体仍在减持。
一边有人撤退，一边有人承接。
接下来需要关注三个价格区域：71,000美元能否守住，73,200美元能否重新站稳，以及75,600美元的短期持有人成本区能否收复。
真正决定BTC下一轮行情方向的，可能不是市场上谁在喊抄底，而是ETF、稳定币和宏观利率等资金信号，什么时候开始出现一致变化。
Original Author: 猫哥1314
X Account: @yonghao131419
Publication Date: November 13, 2026
Original Post: https://x.com/onghao131419/status/2121024991160652234y
Risk Disclaimer:
Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. BTC prices may be affected by a wide range of factors, including macroeconomic conditions, monetary policy, real interest rates, market liquidity, ETF capital flows, stablecoin supply, on-chain holding patterns, and investor sentiment. This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. The price levels and market data discussed reflect observations at a specific point in time and do not predict future price movements. Historical data and on-chain indicators are not guarantees of future performance. Investors should make independent decisions based on their own risk tolerance. Before using futures or other leveraged products, users should fully understand margin requirements, funding rates, and liquidation risks.